<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8220;Physical&#8221; vs. &#8220;chemical&#8221; sunscreens and other sunscreen myths	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.kindofstephen.com/physical-vs-chemical-sunscreens-myths/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.kindofstephen.com/physical-vs-chemical-sunscreens-myths/</link>
	<description>Hello! I&#039;m a skincare and cosmetic formulator. Here&#039;s my thoughts on skin care and cosmetic research.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 11:57:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.9.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Kasia Foxx		</title>
		<link>https://www.kindofstephen.com/physical-vs-chemical-sunscreens-myths/#comment-218</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kasia Foxx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2018 13:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kindofstephen.com/?p=1045#comment-218</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thank you for such an informative post! I have a question that I can’t seem to find a solid answer on: some people say that zinc oxide is only truly effective at 15-20% concentration, however most sunscreen have it at far less. My favorite Skinceuticals one has only 5%. I’ve heard people say that the formula matters more than the concentration, and I should still be getting appropriate UVA/UVB protection, but I wonder if it’s true. What are your thoughts on this?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for such an informative post! I have a question that I can’t seem to find a solid answer on: some people say that zinc oxide is only truly effective at 15-20% concentration, however most sunscreen have it at far less. My favorite Skinceuticals one has only 5%. I’ve heard people say that the formula matters more than the concentration, and I should still be getting appropriate UVA/UVB protection, but I wonder if it’s true. What are your thoughts on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: daypeach		</title>
		<link>https://www.kindofstephen.com/physical-vs-chemical-sunscreens-myths/#comment-205</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[daypeach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 09:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kindofstephen.com/?p=1045#comment-205</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have not found a place so informative about sunscreens before....please keep writing new posts!! :) Can you do a post about layering sunscreens? I&#039;m layering Avene spf 50 tres haute cream (Tinosorb M)  under Juice Beauty spf 30 tinted (20% ZnO). Is this unnecessary? Im deathly afraid of UVA-1 bc I already have extensive photo damage and want VERY STRONG protection from UVA especially from UVA-1 with no less than spf 50. Do you think a thick layer of the Avene will suffice if I&#039;m driving a couple hours daily in the sun? (Assuming I will reapply once in middle of day)... <img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/13.1.0/72x72/1f64f-1f3fc.png" alt="🙏🏼" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /><img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/13.1.0/72x72/1f64f-1f3fc.png" alt="🙏🏼" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /><img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/13.1.0/72x72/1f64f-1f3fc.png" alt="🙏🏼" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not found a place so informative about sunscreens before&#8230;.please keep writing new posts!! 🙂 Can you do a post about layering sunscreens? I&#8217;m layering Avene spf 50 tres haute cream (Tinosorb M)  under Juice Beauty spf 30 tinted (20% ZnO). Is this unnecessary? Im deathly afraid of UVA-1 bc I already have extensive photo damage and want VERY STRONG protection from UVA especially from UVA-1 with no less than spf 50. Do you think a thick layer of the Avene will suffice if I&#8217;m driving a couple hours daily in the sun? (Assuming I will reapply once in middle of day)&#8230; 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Orion N.		</title>
		<link>https://www.kindofstephen.com/physical-vs-chemical-sunscreens-myths/#comment-126</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Orion N.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2017 03:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kindofstephen.com/?p=1045#comment-126</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I find myself either posting the link to the page or quoting from this. This was so helpful for me. If you notice an uptick in traffic, it&#039;s def me. lol.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find myself either posting the link to the page or quoting from this. This was so helpful for me. If you notice an uptick in traffic, it&#8217;s def me. lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Interesting Research/Articles by Bloggers &#124; Skincare Reviews		</title>
		<link>https://www.kindofstephen.com/physical-vs-chemical-sunscreens-myths/#comment-95</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Interesting Research/Articles by Bloggers &#124; Skincare Reviews]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2017 17:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kindofstephen.com/?p=1045#comment-95</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Sunscreen Myths-KindofStephen [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Sunscreen Myths-KindofStephen [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Emre Y		</title>
		<link>https://www.kindofstephen.com/physical-vs-chemical-sunscreens-myths/#comment-91</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emre Y]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2017 23:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kindofstephen.com/?p=1045#comment-91</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Are avobenzone and octocrylene products ok to use?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are avobenzone and octocrylene products ok to use?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ray		</title>
		<link>https://www.kindofstephen.com/physical-vs-chemical-sunscreens-myths/#comment-89</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 19:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kindofstephen.com/?p=1045#comment-89</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Isn&#039;t low transmittance the more important property in a sunscreen? Light can be absorbed and reflected, but ultimately what matters is what is transmitted. And from playing around with the BASF sunscreen simulator, it seems like organic sunscreens do a pretty poor job of blocking 380-400 nm light, though I don&#039;t know how accurate the BASF sunscreen simulator is. I use only inorganic sunscreen because they can at least get down to 20% transmittance on the simulator while organic sunscreens are all 80%+! Yikes!

But because I don&#039;t know how accurate the simulator is, I think it&#039;s necessary to do a comparison of transmittance between inorganic and organic sunscreen. Something you can do, maybe? ;)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t low transmittance the more important property in a sunscreen? Light can be absorbed and reflected, but ultimately what matters is what is transmitted. And from playing around with the BASF sunscreen simulator, it seems like organic sunscreens do a pretty poor job of blocking 380-400 nm light, though I don&#8217;t know how accurate the BASF sunscreen simulator is. I use only inorganic sunscreen because they can at least get down to 20% transmittance on the simulator while organic sunscreens are all 80%+! Yikes!</p>
<p>But because I don&#8217;t know how accurate the simulator is, I think it&#8217;s necessary to do a comparison of transmittance between inorganic and organic sunscreen. Something you can do, maybe? 😉</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: What I&#8217;m Reading 2.28.17 &#8211; Finley &#38; Laurel		</title>
		<link>https://www.kindofstephen.com/physical-vs-chemical-sunscreens-myths/#comment-71</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[What I&#8217;m Reading 2.28.17 &#8211; Finley &#38; Laurel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 16:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kindofstephen.com/?p=1045#comment-71</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] &#8220;Physical&#8221; vs. &#8220;Chemical&#8221; Sunscreens &#038; Other Sunscreen Myths [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] &#8220;Physical&#8221; vs. &#8220;Chemical&#8221; Sunscreens &amp; Other Sunscreen Myths [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: KindofStephen		</title>
		<link>https://www.kindofstephen.com/physical-vs-chemical-sunscreens-myths/#comment-66</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KindofStephen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2017 06:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kindofstephen.com/?p=1045#comment-66</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.kindofstephen.com/physical-vs-chemical-sunscreens-myths/#comment-65&quot;&gt;Lynn&lt;/a&gt;.

Unfortunately there isn&#039;t much research on layering sunscreens as the US FDA testing method is only for one product. So it&#039;s just conjecture and opinion at this point.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.kindofstephen.com/physical-vs-chemical-sunscreens-myths/#comment-65">Lynn</a>.</p>
<p>Unfortunately there isn&#8217;t much research on layering sunscreens as the US FDA testing method is only for one product. So it&#8217;s just conjecture and opinion at this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lynn		</title>
		<link>https://www.kindofstephen.com/physical-vs-chemical-sunscreens-myths/#comment-65</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lynn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2017 17:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kindofstephen.com/?p=1045#comment-65</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Stephen, what an interesting and helpful article! Thank you! :D

So this, then, makes me wonder. I have seen more than one person recommend layering an inorganic sunscreen over top an organic sunscreen (after it has dried, of course) saying that it provides better protection than just using one or the other. Is there any truth to this? 

Let&#039;s say they use an all organic sunscreen- something with a bunch of great organic filters, let that dry, then apply an all-inorganic sunscreen on top. Is it worth it for very sun sensitive people to consider doing this? Is the addition of more sunscreen filters potentially useful?

I have lupus, so I&#039;m always looking for some new way to get the most out of sunscreen.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Stephen, what an interesting and helpful article! Thank you! 😀</p>
<p>So this, then, makes me wonder. I have seen more than one person recommend layering an inorganic sunscreen over top an organic sunscreen (after it has dried, of course) saying that it provides better protection than just using one or the other. Is there any truth to this? </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s say they use an all organic sunscreen- something with a bunch of great organic filters, let that dry, then apply an all-inorganic sunscreen on top. Is it worth it for very sun sensitive people to consider doing this? Is the addition of more sunscreen filters potentially useful?</p>
<p>I have lupus, so I&#8217;m always looking for some new way to get the most out of sunscreen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Cindy		</title>
		<link>https://www.kindofstephen.com/physical-vs-chemical-sunscreens-myths/#comment-34</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cindy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2016 20:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kindofstephen.com/?p=1045#comment-34</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Making me dig up ochem, Stephen lol -- but excellent post, though in seriousness!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Making me dig up ochem, Stephen lol &#8212; but excellent post, though in seriousness!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Object Caching 14/30 objects using disk
Page Caching using disk: enhanced 
Minified using disk
Database Caching using disk

Served from: www.kindofstephen.com @ 2022-08-04 08:12:28 by W3 Total Cache
-->